Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?

From: Sean <iihero(at)qq(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?
Date: 2024-03-18 13:51:27
Message-ID: tencent_DDB8F58E4291FA8FB5AD82AE317519A77E07@qq.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks Daniel.&nbsp;&nbsp;
That's a big help to me!

------------------&nbsp;Original&nbsp;------------------
From: "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se&gt;;
Date:&nbsp;Mon, Mar 18, 2024 09:49 PM
To:&nbsp;"Sean"<iihero(at)qq(dot)com&gt;;
Cc:&nbsp;"pgsql-hackers"<pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org&gt;;
Subject:&nbsp;Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?

&gt; On 18 Mar 2024, at 14:43, Sean <iihero(at)qq(dot)com&gt; wrote:
&gt;
&gt; Hi,
&gt; Thanks for your information.&nbsp; Even using SCRAM,&nbsp; when specified the content of "password",&nbsp; still there is a basic request about the length of it.&nbsp; From the source code, seems there is no restriction, right? 

SCRAM stores a hashed fixed-size representation of the password, so there is no
restriction in terms of length on the user supplied secret.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-03-18 13:52:28 Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-03-18 13:49:58 Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?