| From: | ZizhuanLiu X-MAN <44973863(at)qq(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniil Davydov <3danissimo(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG with accessing to temporary tables of other sessions still exists |
| Date: | 2026-06-20 15:48:55 |
| Message-ID: | tencent_696AA44657F8BCB63C5AAB09EBEF0A4B6B07@qq.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, Jun 3, 2026 at 10:20?PM Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de> wrote:
>>
>> Session 1 here does not create a temporary table (most likely a copy &
>> paste error), but I could reproduce this error as you suggested:
>>
>
>Sorry, I wrote it manually and forgot to specify "TEMP". It is implied here,
>of course.
>
>>
>> At a first glance the check seems reasonable. One tiny wording nit: the
>> comment in ExtendBufferedRelLocal says "... covering any attempt to
>> extend local relation.", but to avoid any confusing with the meaning of
>> RELATION_IS_LOCAL I'd argue that "covering any attempt to extend a
>> temporary relation" would be slightly clearer.
>>
>
>Thanks for looking into this! I agree with your comment.
>
>Please, see v2 patch with fixed comment.
>
>--
>Best regards,
>Daniil Davydov
Hi, Daniil , Jim
Just as described in the comment of RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP macro in rel.h,
existing buffer manager routines including ReadBuffer_common(), StartReadBuffersImpl()
and PrefetchBuffer() have already invoked this macro to check cross-session temporary
table access. All these functions are located in bufmgr.c.
For code consistency, I suggest adding the same RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP check in
ExtendBufferedRelCommon() (also in bufmgr.c), right before calling ExtendBufferedRelLocal().
Meanwhile, we should also update the comment of RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP accordingly
to keep the documentation synchronized with code changes.
regards,
--
ZizhuanLiu (X-MAN)
44973863(at)qq(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bryan Green | 2026-06-20 17:48:05 | Re: [PATCH] O_CLOEXEC not honored on Windows - handle inheritance chain |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2026-06-20 13:16:04 | Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread |