Re:Update some comments for fasthash

From: zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:Update some comments for fasthash
Date: 2026-01-14 10:09:09
Message-ID: tencent_13C5F4B73E1F789839504D0C@qq.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I noticed that "hashcode code" in the patch seems a bit redundant — it might be worth adjusting this part.
```
- * interface. Returns the same 64-bit hashcode code as the original,
+ * interface. Returns the same 64-bit hashcode as the original,
```

--
Regards,
Man Zeng
www.openhalo.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Jones 2026-01-14 10:09:59 Re: WIP - xmlvalidate implementation from TODO list
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2026-01-14 09:58:23 Re: [Patch] add new parameter to pg_replication_origin_session_setup