Re: Why is_admin_of_role() use ROLERECURSE_MEMBERS rather than ROLERECURSE_PRIVS?

From:	cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com>
To:	pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Why is_admin_of_role() use ROLERECURSE_MEMBERS rather than ROLERECURSE_PRIVS?
Date:	2025-12-23 03:04:55
Message-ID:	tencent_0810E1611C84DB59866214C2D4C6A404C90A@qq.com
Views:	Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2025-11-18 08:41:45 from cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com>  2025-11-19 03:42:59 from cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com>   2025-11-24 03:22:08 from cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com> 📎    2025-12-23 03:04:55 from cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com> 📎  2025-12-23 04:05:11 from Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>   2025-12-23 06:21:51 from cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com> 📎
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
v2-0001-Use-ROLERECURSE_PRIVS-in-is_admin_of_role.patch	application/octet-stream	3.1 KB

In response to

• Re: Why is_admin_of_role() use ROLERECURSE_MEMBERS rather than ROLERECURSE_PRIVS? at 2025-11-24 03:22:08 from cca5507

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Paul A Jungwirth	2025-12-23 03:25:46	Re: domain for WITHOUT OVERLAPS
Previous Message	Chao Li	2025-12-23 02:59:45	Re: Switch buffile.c/h to use pgoff_t