Re: A better translation version of Chinese forpsql/po/zh_CN.po file

the zh_CN.po is different with the TW version.
I think, Álvaro is right. Please download the current po files from https://babel.postgresql.org/ and make the change, then submit the patch.

------------------
Regards,
Sean (Xiong He)

------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Alvaro Herrera";<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>;
Date: Sat, Sep 5, 2015 01:31 AM
To: "Rugal Bernstein"<tenjindescend(at)gmail(dot)com>;
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas"<hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>; "pgsql-translators"<pgsql-translators(at)postgresql(dot)org>; "Xiong He"<iihero(at)qq(dot)com>;
Subject: Re: [pgsql-translators] A better translation version of Chinese forpsql/po/zh_CN.po file

Rugal Bernstein wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry for the later response. I am not familiar with the commit procedure.
> I am here to raise this patch again in the 2015-11 commitfest.
> Still the same, I am pretty confident with my translation. I guarantee it
> is very orthodox and much more native than the TW version.

Hi,

Please have a look at this website: https://babel.postgresql.org/
In there, you will find a lot of information about the current status of
the translation of all the various branches for the language, as well as
a git repository that you can clone. The repository contains branches
for each active Postgres branch.

The methodology I recommend you follow is to download a .po file from
the website, then use it as a base to apply your new translations.

I just pushed your translation to the master branch (which is for
Postgres 9.5) -- to do so, I downloaded
https://babel.postgresql.org/po-current/psql-zh_CN.po (linked in the
website) then ran "msgmerge your-file.po psql-zh_CN.po", then committed
that as the new version of psql/zh_CN.po.

Hmm, ouch. After pushing, I found out that during 2014, our established
translator Xiong He was still active:
http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=320&aid=1011462&group_id=1000064
Did you try contacting him before updating the translation? What is the
reason for this alleged divergence? I don't see Xiong He updating the
TW translation (which has stalled since 2011) so I have trouble
understanding exactly why you are calling our existing translation "the
TW version".

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Service