Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] JDBC patch for util.Serialize and jdbc2.PreparedStatement

From: Rene Pijlman <rpijlman(at)wanadoo(dot)nl>
To: "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] JDBC patch for util.Serialize and jdbc2.PreparedStatement
Date: 2001-08-23 21:37:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbcpgsql-patches
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:37:27 -0400, you wrote:
>a patch [...] that fixes the ability to "serialize" a simple java class 
>into a postgres table.
>The current cvs seems completely broken in this support, so the patch 
>puts it into working condition, granted that there are many limitations 
>with serializing java classes into Postgres.

I would appreciate it if you would explain to us a little more
what does and doesn't work before and after applying this patch.

[jdbc-list added to the CC]

René Pijlman

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Vsevolod LobkoDate: 2001-08-23 22:04:21
Subject: Re: Patch for pl/tcl Tcl_ExternalToUtf and Tcl_UtfToExternal support
Previous:From: Magnus Naeslund(f)Date: 2001-08-23 21:22:14
Subject: [PATCH] Win32 errno a little bit safer

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-08-23 21:56:51
Subject: Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? [was Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...]
Previous:From: Johann ZuschlagDate: 2001-08-23 21:31:05
Subject: Re: Re: Comparing fixed precision to floating (no anwer)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group