Re: [PATCHES] JDBC patch for util.Serialize and jdbc2.PreparedStatement

From: Rene Pijlman <rpijlman(at)wanadoo(dot)nl>
To: "Robert B(dot) Easter" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] JDBC patch for util.Serialize and jdbc2.PreparedStatement
Date: 2001-08-23 21:37:27
Message-ID: sltaotokjv4kg28caibcc5u1rc2mpm7psh@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches

On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:37:27 -0400, you wrote:
>a patch [...] that fixes the ability to "serialize" a simple java class
>into a postgres table.
>
>The current cvs seems completely broken in this support, so the patch
>puts it into working condition, granted that there are many limitations
>with serializing java classes into Postgres.

I would appreciate it if you would explain to us a little more
what does and doesn't work before and after applying this patch.

[jdbc-list added to the CC]

Regards,
René Pijlman

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-23 21:56:51 Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? [was Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...]
Previous Message Johann Zuschlag 2001-08-23 21:31:05 Re: Re: Comparing fixed precision to floating (no anwer)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vsevolod Lobko 2001-08-23 22:04:21 Re: Patch for pl/tcl Tcl_ExternalToUtf and Tcl_UtfToExternal support
Previous Message Magnus Naeslund(f) 2001-08-23 21:22:14 [PATCH] Win32 errno a little bit safer