Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT

On 2005-12-31, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> wrote:
> You do bring up the possibility of secondary sort functions. Functions
> which are not involved in testing for equality, but provide addition
> sorting so that even in a case-insensetive sort, the different
> variations in case appear together. "All variations are equal, but some
> are more equal than others" type setup.

Doesn't this result in incorrect output in multi-column sorts?

i.e. if 'Foo' = 'foo', but for sorting purposes you always sort them
with 'Foo' first, then a multicolumn sort of the following data:

('Foo',1)
('foo',2)
('Foo',3)

would produce the wrong output, no?

--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services