Re: Fixing r-tree semantics

From: Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Date: 2005-06-23 22:53:05
Message-ID: slrndbmfah.192v.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2005-06-23, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I looked into the r-tree breakage discussed in this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-03/msg01135.php

See also http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-01/msg00328.php
in which I made most of the same points.

Notice also that contrib/seg and contrib/cube have their own, and
incompatible, idea of what the semantics of &< and &> should be.

--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-06-23 22:53:47 Re: Fixing r-tree semantics
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-23 21:59:25 Fixing r-tree semantics