Re: List response time...

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, "Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: List response time...
Date: 2001-08-21 20:26:26
Message-ID: si8zgd17nx.fsf@daffy.airs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> All the delay seems to be in transferring the message from
> postgresql.org to webmail.postgresql.org ... which are the same
> machine, or at least the same IP address. What's up with that?

You are seeing sendmail's poorly designed queuing behaviour in action.
sendmail limits itself by outgoing messages, rather than outgoing
deliveries. This causes one slow delivery to hold up many fast
deliveries.

Ian

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikhail Terekhov 2001-08-21 20:31:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: WIN32 errno patch
Previous Message Ian Lance Taylor 2001-08-21 20:24:27 Re: List response time...