Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance

From: "Michael McAlpine" <mikem(at)vis(dot)oregonian(dot)com>
To: jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance
Date: 2001-12-31 21:48:40
Message-ID: sc306ce2.046@gw.oregonian.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks for the reply.

Explain results:

NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:

Seq Scan on table1 (cost=0.00..163277.83 rows=1 width=300)

EXPLAIN

Michael

>>> "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org> 12/31 1:37 PM >>>

On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Michael McAlpine wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Why does Postgres have such poor response times on LIKE queries.
>
> In my database I have 1 table of 3.5 million rows. I try the follogin search
>
> select * from table1 where name like 'SMITH, JO%';
>
>
> this query takes 1:30 seconds to return the matching row.
>
> I have physically order the table by name and added an index to name
> and performed a vacuum analyze to see if that helps. but still 1:30
> for a result.
>
> I have built the same setup on a MS SQL Server database and get
> response times of 1 to 2 seconds for the same query.

What does explain say?

-jwb

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey W. Baker 2001-12-31 21:51:58 Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance ofPostgresql
Previous Message Jeffrey W. Baker 2001-12-31 21:37:56 Re: Large Tables/clustering/terrible performance of