Re: Autonomous transaction

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pg1(at)thetdh(dot)com, Loïc Vaumerel <shefla(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autonomous transaction
Date: 2010-04-14 00:23:16
Message-ID: s2w603c8f071004131723r5bd2635eu5554ff15805398a6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Yea, having some things in our system be non-transactional is odd and
> hard to understand.  Just thinking about it, it seems it would introduce
> all sorts of odd behaviors.

I think it would be really useful, though, for users and maybe even
for system internals. Working out the semantics is a challenge, but
not an insurmountable one, I think.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-04-14 00:24:24 Re: Autonomous transaction
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-04-14 00:14:30 Re: Nice hint on table aliasing!