| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks |
| Date: | 2010-04-29 19:45:24 |
| Message-ID: | s2sdcc563d11004291245p6b1c6d21ica829e7c5730201a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> With the increase in the number of disks that we can afford to have in
> 1 box..we will definitely plan on having WAL on dedicated disks.
> Previously..we were stuck with the chassis limitation of 6 disks per
> box.
Yeah, the smallest machine I use to build a db server now is one that
can hold 8 drives, 4 for a slony clone maybe. If you go with the
24x2.5 chassis please report back on how it works. I'm looking at the
16 or 24 x 2.5 cases for increasing density and keeping down costs on
rack space.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Whitney | 2010-04-29 19:51:20 | Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks |
| Previous Message | Anj Adu | 2010-04-29 19:35:01 | Re: more 10K disks or less 15K disks |