Re: default privileges

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: default privileges
Date: 2010-04-03 23:56:49
Message-ID: s2q3073cc9b1004031656rb12d8438l7413a7d9811903cb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Yeah.  The problem here is that once you've created an entry in
>> pg_default_acl, there is no way to make it go away.
>
> Actually that's not true: you can get rid of it with DROP OWNED BY.
> This fact is even documented in the ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES manual
> page:
>
>        If you wish to drop a role that has had its global default
>        privileges altered, it is necessary to use DROP OWNED BY first,
>        to get rid of the default privileges entry for the role.
>

ah! i obviously didn't read the manual in detail :)

> Not sure if this is good enough or we need to provide some more-obvious
> way of dealing with it.
>

it's strange that a REVOKE doesn't clean what a GRANT did, and DROP
OWNED BY seems very dangerous (at least if i forgot to make REASSIGN
OWNED first).

we can let it as it is, but at least we can add a HINT for use DROP
OWNED BY having execute REASSIGN OWNED first...
or we can make what seems more reasonable, make the REVOKE clean the mess :)

if you prefer the second way i can try to prepare a patch

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2010-04-04 05:39:02 "pg_stat_tmp/pgstat.stat": Stale NFS file handle
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-04-03 21:27:47 Re: default privileges