| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Streamify more code paths |
| Date: | 2026-03-11 00:16:50 |
| Message-ID: | r2lwb3342lwrvyoz4fuwctfgfx776rm22ttaytvlinbkarakmp@gujbzwverhra |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2026-03-10 19:27:59 -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > pgstattuple_large base= 12429.3ms patch= 11916.8ms 1.04x
> > > ( 4.1%) (reads=206945->12983, io_time=6501.91->32.24ms)
> >
> > > pgstattuple_large base= 12642.9ms patch= 11873.5ms 1.06x
> > > ( 6.1%) (reads=206945->12983, io_time=6516.70->143.46ms)
> >
> > Yeah, this looks somewhat strange. The io_time has been reduced
> > significantly, which should also lead to a substantial reduction in
> > runtime.
>
> It's possible that the bottleneck just moved, e.g to the checksum computation,
> if you have data checksums enabled.
>
> It's also worth noting that likely each of the test reps measures
> something different, as likely
> psql_run "$ROOT" "$PORT" -c "UPDATE heap_test SET data = data || '!' WHERE id % 5 = 0;"
>
> leads to some out-of-page updates.
>
> You're probably better off deleting some of the data in a transaction that is
> then rolled back. That will also unset all-visible, but won't otherwise change
> the layout, no matter how many test iterations you run.
>
>
> I'd also guess that you're seeing a relatively small win because you're
> updating every page. When reading every page from disk, the OS can do
> efficient readahead. If there are only occasional misses, that does not work.
I think that last one is a big part - if I use
BEGIN; DELETE FROM heap_test WHERE id % 500 = 0; ROLLBACK;
(which leaves a lot of
I see much bigger wins due to the pgstattuple changes.
time buffered time DIO
w/o read stream 2222.078 ms 2090.239 ms
w read stream 299.455 ms 155.124 ms
That's with local storage. io_uring, but numbers with worker are similar.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2026-03-11 00:21:58 | Re: Remove header lock BufferGetLSNAtomic() on architectures with 64 bit atomic operations |
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2026-03-11 00:11:27 | Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread |