| From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: standbycheck was:(Re: [HACKERS] testing hot standby |
| Date: | 2010-04-26 07:45:21 |
| Message-ID: | q2v3073cc9b1004260045k6eb9deecm5fcd93b843501b55@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> How many of the tests in the regular regression suite do anything useful
> when run against a standby server? They all have to set up a bunch of
> objects before they run queries, so you just get a lot of errors
> complaining that you can't do X in standby mode, followed by errors
> about missing objects. That doesn't sound very useful.
>
>
granted. what i'm looking for is a way of continually see that the
standby will return consistent values and yes, i want to be sure that
we disallow everything that we need to...
maybe just a new set of tests? maybe i just should make the hs_* tests
use regression's database tables intead of the ones it is using?
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-04-26 08:41:30 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-26 07:43:09 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |