Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --

From: Harald Fuchs <hf0722x(at)protecting(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
Date: 2004-09-14 14:15:43
Message-ID: pupt4phr74.fsf@srv.protecting.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

In article <BF88DF69D9E2884B9BE5160DB2B97A85010D6D5F(at)nlshl-exch1(dot)eu(dot)uis(dot)unisys(dot)com>,
"Leeuw van der, Tim" <tim(dot)leeuwvander(at)nl(dot)unisys(dot)com> writes:

> So what I can say is, that if you want fast INSERT performance from
> PostgreSQL then you'll probably have to do some trickery that you
> wouldn't have to do with a default MySQL installation.

I think the word "INSERT" is superfluous in the above sentence ;-)

Contrary to MySQL, you can't expect decent PostgreSQL performance on
decent hardware without some tuning.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Kleiser 2004-09-14 14:23:02 Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
Previous Message Leeuw van der, Tim 2004-09-14 14:00:58 Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --