In article <5ac667b80805270729x4f93cc14n4a868d3d3f624d7b(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>,
"Michael Lourant" <lourant(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Type Safety
> Enumerated types are completely separate data types and may not be compared
> with each other.
> An Alternative Way To Do The Same
> Instead of using an enum type we can set up a CHECK CONSTRAINT - this tells
> postgresql to make sure that the value we are entering is valid.
> CREATE TABLE person (
> personid int not null primary key,
> favourite_colour varchar(255) NOT NULL,
> CHECK (favourite_colour IN ('red', 'blue', 'yellow', 'purple'))
> INSERT INTO person(personid, favourite_colour) VALUES (1, 'red');
> INSERT 0 1
> Now for something not in the list:
> INSERT INTO person(personid, favourite_colour) VALUES (2, 'green');
> ERROR: new row for relation "person" violates check constraint "person_favourite_colour_check"
Type safety is the thing you lose by replacing an ENUM by a CHECK
constraint - you can still do something nonsensical like
SELECT * FROM person WHERE favourite_colour = 'green'
In response to
pgsql-sql by date
|Next:||From: Richard Broersma||Date: 2008-05-27 16:29:56|
|Subject: Re: Extremely Low performance with ODBC|
|Previous:||From: Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz||Date: 2008-05-27 15:53:05|
|Subject: UPDATE with table join|