From: | "Holger Hoffstaette" <holger(at)wizards(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
Date: | 2005-01-20 16:55:56 |
Message-ID: | pan.2005.01.20.16.55.53.484000@wizards.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:32:27 +0100, Hervé Piedvache wrote:
> Le Jeudi 20 Janvier 2005 16:23, Dave Cramer a écrit :
>> Google uses something called the google filesystem, look it up in
>> google. It is a distributed file system.
>
> Yes that's another point I'm working on ... make a cluster of server using
> GFS ... and making PostgreSQL running with it ...
Did you read the GFS whitepaper? It really works differently from other
filesystems with regard to latency and consistency. You'll probably have
better success with Lustre (http://www.clusterfs.com/) or RedHat's Global
File System (http://www.redhat.com/software/rha/gfs/)
If you're looking for a 'cheap, free and easy' solution you can just as
well stop right now. :-)
-h
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-01-20 16:59:34 | Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance??? |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-01-20 16:53:14 | Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance??? |