Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering

From: "Holger Hoffstaette" <holger(at)wizards(dot)de>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date: 2005-01-20 16:55:56
Message-ID: pan.2005.01.20.16.55.53.484000@wizards.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:32:27 +0100, Hervé Piedvache wrote:

> Le Jeudi 20 Janvier 2005 16:23, Dave Cramer a écrit :
>> Google uses something called the google filesystem, look it up in
>> google. It is a distributed file system.
>
> Yes that's another point I'm working on ... make a cluster of server using
> GFS ... and making PostgreSQL running with it ...

Did you read the GFS whitepaper? It really works differently from other
filesystems with regard to latency and consistency. You'll probably have
better success with Lustre (http://www.clusterfs.com/) or RedHat's Global
File System (http://www.redhat.com/software/rha/gfs/).
If you're looking for a 'cheap, free and easy' solution you can just as
well stop right now. :-)

-h

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2005-01-20 16:59:34 Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance???
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2005-01-20 16:53:14 Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance???