Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ANSI SQL-2003 conformance

From: Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANSI SQL-2003 conformance
Date: 2004-11-15 20:49:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:35:52 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I think you should just submit incremental patches for the relevant 
> files.

My best shot is still

There are a number of features which are currently set to conformance=no
but which might actually be implemented. That list hasn't changed from
this post:

> But if you wait much longer

I agree that it's getting late. I'm behind on every project that I'm
involved in, and will probably not time to work more on this :-(

Simon/Elein: Do you plan to put more work into this?

If noone has the time to look over those
probably-not-conforming-but-just-maybe features, I suggest that we just go
along with the above patch.

Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Estienne van VelzenDate: 2004-11-15 21:04:29
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on Guest Host (VMWare)
Previous:From: ON.KGDate: 2004-11-15 20:49:37
Subject: PostgreSQL on Guest Host (VMWare)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group