Re: LISTEN / NOTIFY performance in 8.3

From: Joel Stevenson <jrs_1(at)mac(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LISTEN / NOTIFY performance in 8.3
Date: 2008-02-25 16:48:20
Message-ID: p06240807c3e8a18faa42@[192.168.0.9]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>Also, it might be worth enabling log_lock_waits to see if the slow
>notifies are due to having to wait on some lock or other.

Turning on log_lock_waits shows that there is a lot of waiting for
locks on the pg_listener table ala:

process 22791 still waiting for ExclusiveLock on relation 2614 of
database 16387 after 992.397 ms
...
process 22791 acquired ExclusiveLock on relation 2614 of database
16387 after 1433.152 ms

deadlock_timeout is left at the default 1s setting.

Though these are being generated during application activity -
running the simulation script does produce 300ms - 600ms NOTIFY
statements but doesn't (at the moment) trigger a lock_wait log entry.

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kynn Jones 2008-02-25 16:50:44 Re: Q on views and performance
Previous Message Matthew 2008-02-25 14:27:12 Re: Weird issue with planner choosing seq scan