Re: Geometry test on NetBSD (was Re: [HACKERS] RC1?)

At 1:51 PM -0500 11/20/02, Tom Lane wrote:
>Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:21:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Ah-hah, so it is a version issue --- we could make the resultmap line
>>> something like
>>> geometry/.*-netbsd1.[0-5]=geometry-positive-zeros
>
>> NetBSD/i386-1.6H i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6H (checked 7.3rc1)
>> NetBSD/acorn32-1.6K arm-unknown-netbsdelf1.6K (still building 7.3rc1)
>
>Hm, is that "elf" always there? I'm a little uncomfortable with making
>the pattern be
> geometry/.*-netbsd.*1.[0-5]=geometry-positive-zeros
>as this seems way too lax ...

A version like 1.6[A-Z] is a -current, not a release version from in
between 1.5.x and 1.6.

Different NetBSD ports have converted to elf at different times and
not all ports are using elf even with 1.6 released.
--
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry(dot)B(dot)Hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu