Re: PostgreSQL 7.2 docs

At 2:40 PM -0500 3/1/02, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Rich Morin wrote:
>> At 7:23 PM -0500 2/26/02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> >Well, the internals.ps paper was removed for a reason, so I'd advise
>> >you not to print it.
>>
>> And that reason would be??? Seriously, it seems like a useful paper;
>> even if it isn't needed in the distribution, it may be worth printing.

Peter E>It doesn't correspond to reality any longer.

Bruce M>I just bloated the tarball and wasn't really for general consuption.

It sounds like the paper should probably be left out of the next set of
PostgreSQL volumes. Perhaps it could go into a volume of "historic" papers.

-r
--
email: rdm(at)cfcl(dot)com; phone: +1 650-873-7841
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm - my home page, resume, etc.
http://www.cfcl.com/Meta - The FreeBSD Browser, Meta Project, etc.
http://www.ptf.com/dossier - Prime Time Freeware's DOSSIER series
http://www.ptf.com/tdc - Prime Time Freeware's Darwin Collection