Re: pg_hba.conf change in 7.4

From: Seum-Lim Gan <slgan(at)lucent(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_hba.conf change in 7.4
Date: 2003-12-06 18:45:30
Message-ID: p0510031bbbf7d3d68739@[192.168.10.94]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Bruce,

Thanks for the recommendation.

I will edit the pg_config.h file and comment out the
HAVE_IPV6 #define.
It is now defined as 0.

Earlier on, I tried to set IPV6 to no or 0 in configure.ih
and then configure and rebuild but that did not work.

Will let you know if commenting out the HAVE_IPV6 will work.

Thanks.

Gan

At 11:28 am -0500 2003/12/6, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Seum-Lim Gan wrote:
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> I wonder if there is any recommendation to this ?
>> Is there a way to configure PostgreSQL to not use
>> IPv6 ?
>
>One idea is to edit include/pg_config.h and comment out HAVE_IPV6 and
>recompile and see if it works. That will disable the postmaster from
>listening on IPv6.
>
>--
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Seum-Lim GAN email : slgan(at)lucent(dot)com |
| Lucent Technologies |
| 2000 N. Naperville Road, 6B-403F tel : (630)-713-6665 |
| Naperville, IL 60566, USA. fax : (630)-713-7272 |
| web : http://inuweb.ih.lucent.com/~slgan |
+--------------------------------------------------------+

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-12-06 18:48:17 Re: 7.3 --> 7.4 C Functions
Previous Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-12-06 17:48:23 7.3 --> 7.4 C Functions