From: | PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com |
Cc: | "Gary Doades" <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Date: | 2005-01-11 01:24:47 |
Message-ID: | opskezjlb7th1vuj@musicbox |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> I'm curious, why do you think that's serious ? What do you really expect
Simply because I don't like VB non .NET, but C# is a much much better
language, and even VB.NET is decent.
> to do in the stored procedure ? Anything of consequence will seriously
> degrade performance if you select it in say a million rows.
Well, if such a thing needed to be done, like processing a lot of rows to
yield a small result set, it certainly should be done inside the server,
but as another poster said, being really careful about memory usage.
But, that was not my original idea ; I find that even for small functions
plsql is a bit ugly compared to the usual suspects like Python and others
; unfortunately I think there is overhead in converting the native
postgres datatype to their other language counterparts, which is why I did
not try them (yet).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Miles Keaton | 2005-01-11 02:42:13 | which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2005-01-11 00:04:37 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |