From: | PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | My postmaster just crashed ! |
Date: | 2005-01-27 16:26:26 |
Message-ID: | opsk9ryccyth1vuj@musicbox |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
It seems that contrib/intagg crashes my server :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
select int_agg_final_array(1);
server closed the connection unexpectedly
This probably means the server terminated abnormally
before or while processing the request.
The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's the logfile :
TRACE: le systeme de bases de donnees est pret
TRACE: processus serveur (PID 26882) a ete arrete par le signal 11
TRACE: Arret des autres processus serveur actifs
FATAL: Le systeme de bases de donnees est en cours de restauration
TRACE: Tous les processus serveur se sont arretes, reinitialisation
TRACE: le systeme de bases de donnees a ete interrompu a 2005-01-27
17:22:48 CET
TRACE: l'enregistrement du point de verification est a 1/F3854A94
TRACE: re-execution de l'enregistrement a 1/F3854A94 ; l'annulation de
l'enregistrement est a 0/0 ; arret TRUE
TRACE: prochain identifiant de transaction : 5800 ; prochain OID : 4533584
TRACE: le systeme de bases de donnees n'a pas ete arrete proprement ;
restauration automatique en cours
TRACE: enregistrement de longueur nulle sur 1/F3854AD0
TRACE: la re-execution n'est pas requise
TRACE: le systeme de bases de donnees est pret
What do you think ?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-01-27 17:03:55 | Re: Inconsistent behavior with TIMESTAMP WITHOUT and epoch |
Previous Message | Tamas Vincze | 2005-01-27 16:06:54 | 8.0.0 make check fails on Solaris 9 (sparc) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-01-27 16:35:40 | Re: visualizing B-tree index coverage |
Previous Message | TJ O'Donnell | 2005-01-27 15:38:14 | Re: visualizing B-tree index coverage |