Re: Using LIMIT changes index used by planner

From: Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using LIMIT changes index used by planner
Date: 2004-12-24 02:05:59
Message-ID: opsjhpf9t8cq72hf@musicbox
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:43:07 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Sven Willenberger <sven(at)dmv(dot)com> writes:
>> explain analyze select storelocation,order_number from custacct where
>> referrer = 1365 and orderdate between '2004-12-07' and '2004-12-07
>> 12:00:00' order by custacctid limit 10;

why not create an index on referrer, orderdate ?

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud 2004-12-24 02:19:27 Re: Caching of Queries
Previous Message Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud 2004-12-24 01:47:40 Re: LIMIT causes SEQSCAN in subselect