Re: fsync vs open_sync

From: Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fsync vs open_sync
Date: 2004-09-05 18:03:04
Message-ID: opsdu8fetccq72hf@musicbox
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


I trust ReiserFS 3.
I wouldn't trust the 4 before maybe 1-2 years.

On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 07:41:29 -0400, Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net> wrote:

> Christopher Browne wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure what all SuSE supports; they're about the only other Linx
>> vendor that EMC would support, and I don't expect that Reiser4 yet
>> fits into the "supportable" category :-(.
>
> I use quite a bit of SuSE, and although I don't know their official
> position on Reiser file systems, I do know that it is the default when
> installing, so I'd suggest you might check into it.
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marinos J. Yannikos 2004-09-05 23:28:04 Re: Table UPDATE is too slow
Previous Message Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud 2004-09-05 18:01:30 Re: fsync vs open_sync