Re: Rethinking stats communication mechanisms

From: PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rethinking stats communication mechanisms
Date: 2006-06-19 08:50:16
Message-ID: op.tbdxh2jgcigqcu@apollo13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Great minds think alike ;-) ... I just committed exactly that protocol.
> I believe it is correct, because AFAICS there are only four possible
> risk cases:

Congrats !

For general culture you might be interested in reading this :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_transactional_memory
http://libcmt.sourceforge.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2006-06-19 08:52:09 Re: regresssion script hole
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2006-06-19 08:44:10 Re: regresssion script hole