Re: partial index regarded more expensive

From:	PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>
To:	"Tobias Brox" <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: partial index regarded more expensive
Date:	2005-08-10 18:15:13
Message-ID:	op.sva0znchth1vuj@localhost
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2005-08-10 17:52:08 from Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>  2005-08-10 18:15:13 from PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>   2005-08-10 18:31:42 from Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>  2005-08-11 03:14:40 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-performance

In response to

• partial index regarded more expensive at 2005-08-10 17:52:08 from Tobias Brox

Responses

• Re: partial index regarded more expensive at 2005-08-10 18:31:42 from Tobias Brox

Browse pgsql-performance by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tobias Brox	2005-08-10 18:31:42	Re: partial index regarded more expensive
Previous Message	Tobias Brox	2005-08-10 17:52:08	partial index regarded more expensive