Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Date: 2025-11-06 17:45:30
Message-ID: nyqvz367sj7zum6fm32g4mhgarugdo5eayi44saheokmheo6p4@vnbs65jckga7
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-11-06 11:17:52 -0600, Bryan Green wrote:
> From d3f7543a35b3b72a7069188302cbfc7e4de9120b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 10:56:02 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix Windows file I/O to support files larger than 2GB

Could we add a testcase that actually exercises at least some of the
codepaths? We presumably wouldn't want to actually write that much data, but
it shouldn't be hard to write portable code to create a file with holes...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-11-06 18:26:38 Re: Some efforts to get rid of "long" in our codebase
Previous Message Bryan Green 2025-11-06 17:17:52 Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB