From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Separate DDL and SQL users |
Date: | 2016-03-11 13:08:27 |
Message-ID: | nbug0b$k9m$1@ger.gmane.org |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Rob Emery schrieb am 11.03.2016 um 12:18:
> So we're looking at automating our migrations against PG for the
> developers so that it's simple enough for them and no maintenance for
> me. I'm struggling to find a role/permissions structure that works;
> we've come from SQL Server so we're used to having DBRoles.
>
> So I want the re_migration role to be able to create tables,
> sequences etc and grant to other users etc; yet I want the
> live_application role to be able to select,insert,update,delete.
>
> It seems that the only real solution here is to have the db owned by
> re_migration, then in every migration GRANT
> SELECT,INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE to the live_application role?
You can set default privileges for a schema: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-alterdefaultprivileges.html
If you do that, every object that is created in the schema is automatically assigned those default privileges.
So you only need to do do once, after you create a new schema, e.g.
as re_migration do:
create schema dbo;
grant usage on dbo to life_application;
alter default privileges in schema dbo grant select,insert,update,delete on tables to live_application;
alter default privileges in schema dbo grant usage,select,update on sequences to live_application;
Of course the re_migration role needs to have the privileges to create a schema.
Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rob Emery | 2016-03-11 14:27:10 | Re: Separate DDL and SQL users |
Previous Message | Helio Campos Mello de Andrade | 2016-03-11 12:36:21 | Re: Separate DDL and SQL users |