Re: A maze of twisty mailing lists all the same

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A maze of twisty mailing lists all the same
Date: 2010-04-08 07:46:37
Message-ID: n2p937d27e11004080046y42771174xaebaa9b20c0bd18b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> Because the poster chose to send it to pgsql-admin instead of
> pgsql-general (or pgsql-bugs) very few of the usual suspects had a
> chance to see it. 7 days later a question about a rather serious
> database corruption problem had no responses. I've never understand
> what the point of pgsql-admin is;  just about every question posted is
> an "admin" question of some sort.

I can't argue with that... but a counter argument is that merging
lists would significantly increase the traffic on -general would may
not be appreciated by the many people that are only subscribed to one
or two of the affected lists. I would wager that the majority of
people aren't subscribed to more than a small number of the available
lists.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2010-04-08 07:47:25 Re: A maze of twisty mailing lists all the same
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-08 07:46:23 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset()