Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, chaturvedipalak1911(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart
Date: 2025-10-14 08:35:55
Message-ID: mjtbkm3bhq3nhiqmqzrde7qrelq3iodp5kakgotm54ibg7apcn@6yusl4sigusy
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

As I've mentioned in our off list communication, I'm working on the new
design and was planning to post some intermediate results in a couple of
weeks. Thus I'm surprised that instead of aligning on plans you've
decided to post you own version earlier. It most certainly doesn't make
things easier for me, so what's your plan anyway? Are you trying to
hijack the thread with your own patches? It doesn't strike me as
particularly constructive thing to do.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-10-14 08:44:37 Re: Why pg_dump overwrites dump file?
Previous Message John Naylor 2025-10-14 08:30:19 memory context to complement ASAN