| From: | Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: subversion vs cvs |
| Date: | 2004-03-24 04:26:10 |
| Message-ID: | mjqzna698gt.fsf@cs.berkeley.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc G Fournier <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
Marc> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
>> Which brings me to another question .. has anybody considered
>> using subversion instead of CVS ?
Marc> Why? not that I'm for a chance from something that isn't
Marc> broken, but what advantages does subversion give us over
Marc> what we already have?
I've had plenty of pain with cvs in terms of directories not being
first-class etc .. but I don't really contribute to pgsql so you guys
probably don't have the same experience.
I was just curious as it looks like eventually subversion (or arch :-)
will be an alternative to cvs.
--
Pip-pip
Sailesh
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~sailesh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-03-24 04:29:33 | Re: partial VACUUM FULL |
| Previous Message | glenn | 2004-03-24 04:10:24 | ole db |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-03-24 05:37:49 | Re: linked list rewrite |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-03-24 04:12:19 | Re: bug in 7.4 SET WITHOUT OIDs |