| From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Cursors and backwards scans and SCROLL |
| Date: | 2003-03-10 02:32:23 |
| Message-ID: | m3y93oj6iw.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I'd be in favour of creating whole sets of backwards-compatibility GUC's
> whenever we break backwards compatibility.
>
> eg.
> use_72_compat = yes
> use_73_compat = yes
That sounds like a recipe for a maintenance nightmare to me.
-Doug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-03-10 02:33:18 | Re: Cursors and backwards scans and SCROLL |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-03-10 02:17:26 | Re: Cursors and backwards scans and SCROLL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-03-10 02:33:18 | Re: Cursors and backwards scans and SCROLL |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-03-10 02:17:26 | Re: Cursors and backwards scans and SCROLL |