Re: Cost-based optimizers

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cost-based optimizers
Date: 2005-12-13 04:28:57
Message-ID: m3slsxei2e.fsf@mobile.int.cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=297

I saw it in print; the only thing that seemed interesting about it was
the recommendation that query optimization be biased towards the
notion of "stable plans," query plans that may not be the most
"aggressively fast," but which don't fall apart into hideous
performance if the estimates are a little bit off.
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "ntlug.org")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/lsf.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #114. "I will never accept a challenge from
the hero." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2005-12-13 04:43:07 Re: Which qsort is used
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-13 04:07:58 Re: [GENERAL] missing something obvious about intervals?