Miguel Vaz <pagongski(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I was looking for an opinion on the actual table structure. :-) How should i
> build the data set? Is my second example ok? The first is the long version
> but i wanted to put together all the common fields to both types of "sites"
> and then (maybe) build tables to accomodate the specific fields so there are
> no empty columns on the table if i put everything in the same table.
> [...]
That's way too fuzzy for good advice. Few people build data
sets on archaeological sites, and even those probably don't
use all the same structure.
Tim
(not telepathic)