From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg replication tools? |
Date: | 2004-12-03 02:39:02 |
Message-ID: | m3pt1sqf5l.fsf@knuth.knuth.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Clinging to sanity, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com ("Joshua D. Drake") mumbled into her beard:
> sarlav kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> Which is the best available PG replication tool in market now?
>
> There is no "best", there is only best for your situation. The two
> most supported are:
>
>
>> * Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator * Slony-I
>>
>> Which one of these is a good option for replicating Postgres 7.3.2?
>>
>
> Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator will automatically upgrade you to
> 7.3.8 which you should be running anyway.
>
> I believe Slony will work with 7.3.2.
No, it won't.
I believe there was something about namespace support that did not
stabilize until PostgreSQL 7.3.3, and Slony-I works with that version,
at the earliest.
And you're quite right; "best" is a slippery metric. Like many
things, it may be altered by perspective.
--
If this was helpful, <http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne> rate me
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/postgresql.html
I can see clearly now, the brain is gone...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vishal Kashyap @ [SaiHertz] | 2004-12-03 05:16:31 | Re: pg replication tools? |
Previous Message | Iain | 2004-12-03 01:44:32 | Re: Normalization or Performance |