Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against
Date: 2005-03-11 04:59:06
Message-ID: m3psy6vkv9.fsf@knuth.knuth.cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com (Neil Conway) wrote:
> Christopher Browne wrote:
>> Nothing here prevents individuals from participating in political
>> endeavours, so those that are so interested are free to do so.
>
> Yes, I agree -- I'd rather we not have an "official" stance or the
> like on this issue.

Being a "trans-national" project complicates this somewhat, too.

There are two really conspicuous jurisdictions where participation is
rather mutually exclusive.

- There's the US, where, at some US-centric times, some 'murricans
are wont to assume that everyone should write their
congresscritter, ignoring that some of us don't have a "Congress."

- Then there's Europe, where they occasionally get rather prickly if
they think 'murricans are trying to tell them what to do.

- On the gripping hand (gratuitous Niven/Pournelle reference :-)),
there are folks living in foreign countries who may in effect not
have a vote where they are, whether that be Canadians in the US or
others Down Under. "Getting political" might well injure one's
ability to stay where they are...
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "gmail.com")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/lisp.html
Signs of a Klingon Programmer #3: "By filing this TPR you have
challenged the honor of my family. Prepare to die!"

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-03-11 05:44:21 Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ?
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-03-11 03:54:15 Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against