Re: to_char and i18n

From: Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: to_char and i18n
Date: 2005-12-22 05:50:06
Message-ID: m3oe394r5d.fsf@conexa.fciencias.unam.mx
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:

> There's some functionality in 10g which PostgreSQL does not have:

Good to know. I'm not an Oracle expert, actually I knew this reading
an article in a past issue of the Oracle's magazine about i18n;
essentially they were talking about how easy was for an Oracle
database to get i18n as each parameter in the to_char functions will
behave accordingly to the i18n settings.

Regards,
Manuel.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-12-22 07:01:00 Re: Re: Which qsort is used
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2005-12-22 05:10:00 Re: to_char and i18n

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2005-12-22 08:27:47 Re: to_char and i18n
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2005-12-22 05:11:45 Re: BUG #2120: Crash when doing UTF8<->ISO_8859_8 encoding