Re: What (not) to do in signal handlers

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What (not) to do in signal handlers
Date: 2001-06-14 21:12:23
Message-ID: m3elsmn4ug.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> In short: this code isn't broken, and so I'm not convinced we should
> "fix" it.

Point well taken. I was basically arguing from general principles. ;)

-Doug
--
The rain man gave me two cures; he said jump right in,
The first was Texas medicine--the second was just railroad gin,
And like a fool I mixed them, and it strangled up my mind,
Now people just get uglier, and I got no sense of time... --Dylan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-14 22:09:23 pg_stats view added to CVS tip
Previous Message Nathan Myers 2001-06-14 21:12:06 Re: What (not) to do in signal handlers