Re: Don't removes/recycles WAL files at all

From: Michael Govorun <mike(at)shpion(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Don't removes/recycles WAL files at all
Date: 2003-07-31 08:18:46
Message-ID: m3el07xg61.fsf@shpion.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Yeah, adding or removing -malign-double would change the layout of our
> on-disk data structures, so it's no surprise you'd need to dump and
> reload for that.
>
> Also, -ffast-math is known to be Evil. I thought we had a check to
> prevent that (looks ...) yeah we do; how'd you get by this check in
> timestamp.c?
>
> /*
> * gcc's -ffast-math switch breaks routines that expect exact results from
> * expressions like timeval / 3600, where timeval is double.
> */
> #ifdef __FAST_MATH__
> #error -ffast-math is known to break this code
> #endif

Thanks for info, but I did not see this error.

> As for the other stuff, it theoretically should work, but isn't
>egcs-2.91.66 rather old and buggy? Perhaps a newer gcc would work
>better.

Yes, it's old redhat 6.2 and whole system for a long time needs
upgrade.

--
Michael Govorun

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 2trax 2003-07-31 09:39:35 OT: Address Fields
Previous Message Jean-Christian Imbeault 2003-07-31 07:00:45 Re: Port?