From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1 |
Date: | 2009-09-18 14:20:20 |
Message-ID: | m2zl8s8hcr.fsf@hi-media.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Also, stepping back from me personally, should we try to assign some
> additional reviewers to these patches? Is there some way we can
> divide up review tasks among multiple people so that we're not
> repeating each others work?
>
> Thoughts appreciated, from Heikki, Simon, or others.
How about this proposal:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg00764.php
Regards,
--
dim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2009-09-18 14:23:33 | Re: Hot Standby 0.2.1 |
Previous Message | Marcelo Costa | 2009-09-18 14:02:41 | Re: happy birthday Tom Lane ... |