Re: Need some help: attlen is pg_attributes gives a negative value.. .

From: Roland Roberts <roberts(at)panix(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Need some help: attlen is pg_attributes gives a negative value.. .
Date: 2000-05-04 03:26:56
Message-ID: m2wvlbatbz.fsf@tycho.rlent.pnet
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

Tom> "Klein, Robert" <rvklein(at)ober(dot)com> writes:
>> [ attlen for a char(n) field is -1 ]

>> I know in previous versions the length as defined in the create
>> table statement was given. Any ideas?

Tom> Must have been quite a few versions back; attlen has been -1
Tom> for variable-length datatypes for as long as I've been paying
Tom> attention. (Of course char(n) isn't *really* variable length,
Tom> but it's treated that way so that the representation is the
Tom> same as for varchar(n) and text.)

When did this change? I haven't looked 6.5, but I thought 6.3 still
has bpchar as fixed length and char(n) was blank padded whereas
varchar was not.

roland
--
PGP Key ID: 66 BC 3B CD
Roland B. Roberts, PhD Unix Software Solutions
roberts(at)panix(dot)com 76-15 113th Street, Apt 3B
rbroberts(at)acm(dot)org Forest Hills, NY 11375

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-04 05:08:14 Re: Need some help: attlen is pg_attributes gives a negative value.. .
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-03 20:56:06 Re: Need some help: attlen is pg_attributes gives a negative value.. .