Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Another swing at JSON

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another swing at JSON
Date: 2011-03-30 18:05:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I don't have any objection to putting some comments in the contrib Makefiles
> telling people to use PGXS, but I don't think that at this stage of the
> cycle we can start work on something that so far is just an idea from the
> top of my head.

I might be mistaken on how much work is hidden there, ok, you have the
point.  I will try to clarify this in the doc patch I intend to submit
soon'ish:  we still accept those while getting to beta, right?

Dimitri Fontaine     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jan UrbaƄskiDate: 2011-03-30 18:21:05
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix plpgsql to release SPI plans when a function or DO block is
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-03-30 17:41:31
Subject: pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group