Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I don't have any objection to putting some comments in the contrib Makefiles
> telling people to use PGXS, but I don't think that at this stage of the
> cycle we can start work on something that so far is just an idea from the
> top of my head.
I might be mistaken on how much work is hidden there, ok, you have the
point. I will try to clarify this in the doc patch I intend to submit
soon'ish: we still accept those while getting to beta, right?
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jan Urbański||Date: 2011-03-30 18:21:05|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix plpgsql to release SPI
plans when a function or DO block is|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2011-03-30 17:41:31|
|Subject: pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING|