| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Another swing at JSON |
| Date: | 2011-03-30 20:08:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1301515727-sup-4837@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié mar 30 15:05:36 -0300 2011:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > I don't have any objection to putting some comments in the contrib Makefiles
> > telling people to use PGXS, but I don't think that at this stage of the
> > cycle we can start work on something that so far is just an idea from the
> > top of my head.
>
> I might be mistaken on how much work is hidden there, ok, you have the
> point. I will try to clarify this in the doc patch I intend to submit
> soon'ish: we still accept those while getting to beta, right?
Sure.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2011-03-30 20:42:16 | Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-30 19:42:19 | Re: pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING |