| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded |
| Date: | 2025-11-03 15:13:02 |
| Message-ID: | m2suuaorc5lavczouk3nrt4t6y5mzrprr67ah4fr65gihv6eol@mmi4u6bg2hch |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-11-03 16:06:58 +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Nov-03, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> > I'd like to give this subject another chance for pg19. I'm going to
> > push this if no objections.
>
> Sure. I don't understand why patches 0002 and 0003 are separate though.
FWIW, I appreciate such splits. Even if the functionality isn't usable
independently, it's still different type of code that's affected. And the
patches are each big enough to make that worthwhile for easier review.
One thing that'd be nice to do once we have WAIT FOR is to make the common
case of wait_for_catchup() use this facility, instead of polling...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2025-11-03 15:16:10 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Previous Message | Bryan Green | 2025-11-03 15:12:03 | [PATCH] Fix orphaned backend processes on Windows using Job Objects |