Re: pg_xlogdump

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlogdump
Date: 2013-02-26 16:50:08
Message-ID: m2obf72f5r.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Wait what? So I need to make install before I can compile extensions?
> That doesn't seem to be something realistic.

You know, any extension that's not in our source tree out there is
maintained in a way to target all supported versions of PostgreSQL from
the same sources. I understand that we want to continue applying our
versioning rules to contribs, and I think that it's a good idea.

But now that we're making a real cut decision about that, I think
contribs should be documented as NOT extensions.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-02-26 16:50:37 Re: "COPY foo FROM STDOUT" and ecpg
Previous Message Greg Stark 2013-02-26 16:45:50 Re: "COPY foo FROM STDOUT" and ecpg