From: | plh(at)opim(dot)uconn(dot)edu |
---|---|
To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL - the Linux of Databases... |
Date: | 1998-03-04 04:47:33 |
Message-ID: | m2n2f783kq.fsf@strawberry.uconn.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas G Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
Thomas> *sigh* Postgres runs just fine on a bug-free version of glibc2. We've
Thomas> heard rumors that 2.0.7-pre1 from Debian is close enough, but I can't
Thomas> duplicate that on my RH5.0 production box with Cristian's RH
Thomas> glibc2-2.0.7 package.
Thought you might like to know, Tom, with Cristian's glibc2-2.0.7 rpm I
downloaded yesterday, I was able to get:
mydb=> select '1 min'::timespan;
?column?
--------
@ 1 min
(1 row)
And all time-related regression tests succeeded.
That was with gcc-2.7.2.3, (-O3 -m486), _however_, when compiled with
gcc-2.8.0 (-O3 -mpentium), all that nasty time stuff just crept back again,
don't know why.
BTW, something I'm a bit concerned about -- re: the ``~30 sec deficit'' in
regression test timing results you mentioned a couple of days ago -- I'm also
seeing it here between the official 6.3 and a Feb-15 snapshot (no, LOCALE's
always undef) on both Linux and FreeBSD, and can consistently reproduce it,
with the same test suite (the one from the official 6.3).
And thanks for the docs!
-Pailing
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-03-04 06:01:32 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL - the Linux of Databases... |
Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1998-03-04 04:31:14 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL - the Linux of Databases... |